Teachers as Agents of Social Change Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Teachers as Agents of Social Change - undertake ExampleIn this manner, there is a direct relationship between destination and education. While culture gives identity to a society, education sustains it. Education also plays a dynamic role in society. It performs the help of an initiator of accessible change. It not only generates unused ideas and values but also transmits them to the younger generation. In this chapter, our attempt will be to examine the relationship between education and social change.Education emerges turn up of the needs of society. An individual member passes a expression in course of time, but society continues to exist and new members are added to it by birth. Every society, thus, tries to stay together as a unit and develops a focal point of life. The group members have to train children to carry on the customs, knowledge and skills of the group to preserve and perpetuate their way of life. This function is performed by education. Education also trains people to develop new ideas and adjust to a changing environment. Parents and family play an informal role in education. A more formal part comes from education provided by social groups and community agencies. School, which is especially established for the purpose, conducts the most formal education. School has, thus, become a social necessity for providing special learning. It makes possible the accumulation and transmission of knowledge on a large carapace which were impossible before. Education, thus, performs several social functions. Starting from the socializing role in a family, its tasks cover areas same economic organization, social stratification and political ideas. This is the essence of Apples statement that teachers as well as the whole education system should be the agents of change.More than a century ago, Emile Durkheim rejected the idea that education could be the force to transform society and resolve social ills. Instead, Durkheim concluded that education c an be meliorate only if society itself is reformed. He argued that education is only the image and reflection of society. It imitates and reproduces the latterit does not create it (Durkheim 1951 372-373). closely mainstream proposals for improving education assume that our society is fundamentally sound, but that for some reason, our schools are failing. Different critics prat different villains poor quality teachers, pampered, disruptive or ill-prepared students, the culture of their families, unions, bureaucrats, university schools of education, tests that are too easy, or little curriculum. But if Durkheim was correct, a society has the school system it deserves. Denouncing the poor quality of education is like blaming a mirror because you do not like your reflection. The first step in improving education is to do it that the problems plaguing our schools are rooted in the way our society is organized. We live in a competitive prudence where businesses and individuals conti nually seek advantage and higher profits, and where people on the bottom rung of the economic extend are stigmatized as failures and blamed for their condition. Our culture glorifies violence in sports, movies, video games, and on evening discussion broadcasts that celebrate the death of others through hygienic strategic bombings. It is a society where no one feels have to pay taxes for the broader social good and where welfare