The Wrongful Conviction and Exoneration of David Milgaard :: Criminal Justice Essays

The Wrongful Conviction and Exoneration of David MilgaardBackground At the time of the murder of which David Milgaard was accused of committing he was just 16 eld old. He was a hippie, constantly in trouble. Even before he was a teenager he was getting into trouble. His parents and teachers considered him impulsive he resisted dresser (Regina Leader Post, 1992, as cited in Anderson & Anderson 1998). He was removed from kindergarten because he was considered to be a negative influence on the other children. When he was long dozen he spent time in a psychiatric subject matter (Anderson & Anderson, 1998) Elements of the Crime Gail Miller was a 22-year-old nursing assistant living in Saskatoon. She was found in an alley way between 645 and 730am on January 31st 1969. She had been flubd, stabbed twelve times and left field for dead. The rape was found to have occurred after she died. The police had little evidence fewer clues had been left behind. There had been other attacks in the same area. Authorities well-tried to suppress the information that linked the Miller rape and murder to the 2 other assaults. Milgaards Whereabouts David had decided to take a bumble out to Alberta, along with two of his friends, Ron Wilson and Nichol John. Along the way there David wanted to stop through and through Saskatoon to pick up another friend, Shorty Cadrain. Once they got to Saskatoon they control around not really knowing where they were going. They stopped to help individual out of a snow bank, and got stuck themselves this is when Milgaard ripped his pants, something that came into evidence against him. When they finally arrived at Cadrains home, David changed his pants, and they left to go to Alberta. Larry Fisher, who was later convicted of this crime (Millers murder) was staying in the same home as Cadrain at the time. Some time after returning from their short trip to Alberta, Cadrain heard about the $2000 reward for information into Millers death. Cadrain we nt to the police with a variation of what happened that night, although he had been questioned earlier and had no information to give at that time. This is what make Milgaard a suspect in the case. From then on the police toilsome their efforts on finding evidence implicating Milgaard. Within the statement Cadrain gave to the police he said Milgaard had blood on his clothes, he threw away a womans enhancive case from the car on the way to Alberta and Cadrain also stated that he threatened to kill Wilson and John because they knew too much.