Legal Actiobn toys vs Amazon Essay

1. Based on my research and too from reading the effect for each conp eachs arguments that Toys R Us matte that there was a breach of contract because of Amazon.com took on another party to sell toys and Toys R Us felt that they were sole third party for this. They felt corresponding the contract was breach overly because Amazon.com did not follow the engagement. But Amazon.com felt that Toys R Us breach contract because they could not keep up with the demand of supplies and the levels of the demand. They felt this because Toys R Us could not keep products in stocks especially during the holidays. The judge ruling saying that two parties breach the cartel and saying that neither parties will modernise nothing is adqueate. In mhy opinion, I would take over also terminate the agreement and not award any damages to either party because I finger that they both the agreement and they both were wrong.2. I feel the egressline for the advantages and disadvantages that Amazon.com would take on con arrayred before reservation any agreement with Toys R Us would be they would have checked to unwrap if they can keep up with the demand of the customers and to make sure that they can have all the products in stock as well. I believe that an advantage was that Toys R Us knew a lot rough the Toy Marketing and what customers wanted. I also think that another advantage would be that Amazon.com was getting a percentage of the sales. I do feel that if Amazon.com had any doubts that they should have waited and done to a greater extent research into Toys R Us. I also think that Amazon.com was confident and did not have any problems with divergence into an agreement with them, but if they knew that they were considering other Merchantss, that Amazon.com should have let Toys R Us know before signing agreement, so they could work a relegate deal with them.3. Some recommendations that I would have made to Amazon.com that would have benefited both companies would be is that they should have looked at the sales that was coming in. I also would have also told them that they did to evaluate what Toys R Us would have wooly-minded as well not just them. I would have have agreed to half what was able asked instead of what they pay. I would have also said maybe we can give it another shot and see what Toys R Us wanted when it comes to other merchants that was selling toys as well.They in all probability could have come up with a better agreement. Maybe acknowledge that they could have gotten a better deal with working along side with the other merchants and maybe the profits would have been better.4. I would have unplowed it going because since was highly successful shoe retailer. It could have benefited Amazon.com a lot. This sort that it could have brought money that was being lost when the agreement was terminated with Toys R Us. I would have kept the discrepancy becaise it was well thought out and it was doing so well. Amazon.com could have don e a lot with Zappos and that it could have brought more customers and that it could have been a huge profit in. I know for me if I would have brought Zappos that I would have made sure that Zappos would stay foot race and that my customers would know that there was a place for them to shop at to get shoes from. I also feel that it could have benefit from Amazon.com. Amazon.com could have showed the person or persons who was running it ways to better it, if Amazon.com felt that the form was not good. This would have been good for both.